carepathsTM

  • Home
  • eRecord
    • Price List
    • Outcomes
      • ACE Questionnaire
      • AIMS
      • BPRS
      • Checklist for Autism Spectrum Disorders
      • OQ-30.1
      • OQ-45.2
      • RPI
      • Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale-Parent (VADPRS)
      • Working Alliance Inventory
      • Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale
      • YOQ-30
      • PHQ-9
      • YOQ-2.0
      • GAD-7
      • Multnomah CAS
      • HAM-D
      • Practice Research Networks
  • Our Company
    • What Makes the eRecord Different?
    • Testimonials
    • HIPAA
    • Resources & Partners
  • Our Blog
  • Contact Us
    • Request a Demo
    • Request Information
  • Pay My Bill
  • Practice Research Networks

    • Author: Geoffrey
    • Category: Practice Research Networks (PRNs)
    • Tags: Benchmarking, Research
    • 0 comments

    Practice Research Networks

    CarePaths eRecord sponsors Practice Research Networks (PRNs) through its collaboration with research and clinical training organizations. Currently, CarePaths is sponsoring a number of PRNs, e.g. the Association of Directors of Psychology Training Clinics (http://adptc.clinicprn.org), Family Service of Canada (http://www.fsc.clinicprn.org), the Outdoor Behavioral Health Industry Council (http://obhic.clinicprn.org), and the National Association of Therapeutic Training Schools (http://natsap.clinicprn.org). Practice research networks offer a group of organizations the opportunity to pool data for a variety of purposes, including quality improvement and benchmarking, advocacy, and clinical research. Borkovec, for instance, writes that PRNs are needed now in clinical psychology because of the “increasing pressure to produce evidence that therapies we provide are in fact beneficial” and to answer “society’s questions about the effectiveness of psychotherapy.” In primary care settings, PRNs can help to identify barriers to effective mental health practice and promote best practices. PRNs can also advance basic science by carrying out rigorous experimental investigations in naturalistic settings that allow for unambiguous conclusions about effectiveness.

    CarePaths also participates in a number of other research initiatives and NIMH sponsored research.  CarePaths users can participate in research should they be interested.

    CarePaths enables any user, solo practitioner or clinic, to benchmark their clinical outcomes results against comparative norms. Using nationally recognized instruments such as the OQ 45, OQ 30, YOQ, Mental Health Advisor-30 and others, participants can find out how effective they are in comparison to their peers. Practice evaluation is a powerful quality improvement tool. Clinicians can use the data to demonstrate to referral sources, payers and others, the effectiveness of their services.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • Digg
    • Sphinn
    • del.icio.us
    • Facebook
    • Mixx
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Blogplay
    • Add to favorites
    • email
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Yahoo! Bookmarks
    • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Previous post
  • Next post

Popular posts

  • Most Common CPT Codes used by Non-MD Behavioral Clinicians
  • Behavioral health CPT codes for patients with a physical diagnosis
  • Reimbursement Rates-Prescribers make twice as much as non-prescribers
  • Medicare, Fees, and Parity
  • Credit Cards–The Basics

Share this post

Author Geoffrey

Gravatar

  • WHY OUTCOMES FAILED

  • Video Tutorials by our Clients and Partners

  • Meaningful Use and EHRs and Behavioral Clinicians: Be Careful What You Wish For

  • What’s happening with H & B CPT Codes: A Recap

  • New Opportunites:Treat Elderly Depression and Substance Abuse

  • Home

© 2011 carepaths. All rights reserved. web design by: www.davidpdiana.com